Successful Awake Endotracheal Intubation in a Patient With Predicted Anatomical and Physiological Difficult Airway Undergoing Emergency Surgery at a Secondary-Level Hospital: A Case Report
Main Article Content
Abstract
The management of a predicted difficult airway represents a significant clinical challenge, particularly in emergency settings and in patients with associated anatomical and physiological alterations. Awake tracheal intubation has demonstrated high success rates and a favorable safety profile; however, its use remains limited.
We present the case of a 50-year-old female patient with late-onset sepsis secondary to chronic pyelonephritis who required an urgent left nephrectomy. During the preanesthetic assessment, multiple anatomical and physiopathological predictors of high complexity were identified, allowing classification as a predicted difficult airway with a mixed component. Given this scenario, awake endotracheal intubation was chosen, maintaining spontaneous ventilation, using airway topicalization, titrated sedoanalgesia with fentanyl and propofol, and videolaryngoscopy. Intubation was successful and without respiratory complications.
The coexistence of multiple anatomical and physiological predictors of difficult airway in the context of emergency surgery constitutes a high-risk scenario during anesthetic induction, with an increased likelihood of hypoxia and hemodynamic instability. In this context, awake tracheal intubation allows preservation of spontaneous ventilation and reduces the risk of airway management failure. The use of videolaryngoscopy, combined with adequate topical anesthesia and titrated sedation, facilitated a safe approach tailored to the operator’s experience and available resources.
Difficult airway management in emergency settings requires individualized decision-making based on comprehensive patient assessment, anesthesiologist experience, and the clinical environment. Awake tracheal intubation may contribute to optimizing perioperative safety, as demonstrated in the present case.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Sastre JA, Onrubia-Fuertes X, López T, Abad-Gurumeta A, Casans-Francés R, et al. Guía de la Sociedad Española De Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor (SEDAR), Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES) y Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello (SEORL-CCC) para el manejo de la vía aérea difícil. Parte I/II. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim [Internet]. 2024;71(3):171–206. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2023.08.002
II. Ahmad I, El-Boghdadly K, Iliff H, Dua G, Higgs A, Huntington M, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2025 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth [Internet]. 2025;136(1):283–307. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.10.006
III. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology [Internet]. 2022;136(1):31–81. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002
IV. Karamchandani K, Nasa P, Jarzebowski M, Brewster DJ, De Jong A, Bauer PR, et al. Tracheal intubation in critically ill adults with a physiologically difficult airway. An international Delphi study. Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2024;50(10):1563–79. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07578-2
V. Henschell R, Miller P. A novel difficult-airway prediction tool for emergency airway management: Validation of the HEAVEN criteria in a large air medical cohort. J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2021;60(3):407–8. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.09.053
VI. Zumbana Naula FA, Meza Fonseca MA, Vásquez Medina GA, Masache Jadán BG, Ortiz Quiroz PV, Trujillo Hurtado DR. Actualización en el manejo de la vía aérea difícil: Artículo de revisión: Update on difficult airway management: Review article. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades [Internet]. 2024;5(6). Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i6.3011
VII. Ahmad I, El-Boghdadly K, Bhagrath R, Hodzovic I, McNarry AF, Mir F, et al. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in adults. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2020;75(4):509–28. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.14904
VIII. Köhl V, Wünsch VA, Müller M-C, Sasu PB, Dohrmann T, Peters T, et al. Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airway management: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2024;79(9):957–66. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.16326.
IX. Halliday C, Berry M, Shah SV, Soni S, Saini R, Vaughan D, et al. The Video Classification of Intubation (VCI) score for videolaryngoscopy: a multicentre international feasibility study. Br J Anaesth [Internet]. 2025; Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.11.007.
X. Domínguez-Pérez M, González-Dzib RS. Correlación entre el Índice predictivo de intubación difícil y el Cormack. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023;61(1):15-20. Disponible en:
http://revistamedica.imss.gob.mx/
XI. Soar J, Cook T, Armstrong R, Kane A, Kursomovic E, et al. At the Heart of the Matter. Report and findings of the 7th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists examining Perioperative Cardiac Arrest. Royal College of Anaesthetists: 2023. ISBN 978-1-900936-35-4.
XII. Jiménez-Contreras RJ, Serna-Muñoz R, Jiménez-Ramos A, Bañuelos-Ortiz E, Hurtado-Reyes IC. Manejo de la vía aérea difícil por obstrucción tumoral con paciente despierto. An Med. 2025;68(2):XX–XX. doi:10.24875/AMH.23000007.
XIII. Sahinovic MM, Struys MMRF, Absalom AR. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57(12):1539–1558. doi:10.1007/s40262-018-0672-3.