Endoscopic Extraction of Impacted Stones at Choledochoduodenostomy Site Using Tripod Grasper Forceps: A Rare Case Report

Main Article Content

Min Nay Zar Wyke
Zaw Min Naing
Ye Zaw Htwe
Kyaw Ye Naung Htun
Kyaw Thu Linn
Thant Lwyn San
Khin Aung Htun

Abstract

A 37-year-old man presented with acute epigastric pain radiating to the back after a heavy meal during military duty, associated with bilious vomiting, fever with chills and rigors, constipation, profuse sweating, and respiratory discomfort. He had undergone cholecystectomy, choledochotomy, choledocholithotomy, and choledochoduodenostomy two months earlier for gallstones, common bile duct (CBD) stones, and intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones. Intraoperatively, some intrahepatic stones could not be extracted due to technical limitations. On current admission, initial conservative management was given for suspected acute gastritis. Ultrasound abdomen revealed pneumobilia without pancreatitis. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) surprisingly revealed stone impaction at the choledochoduodenostomy site in the first part of the duodenum (D1). Endoscopic extraction with basket and balloon failed, but successful stone crushing with rat-tooth forceps followed by removal with tripod foreign body forceps retrieved two large stones. The patient improved significantly, with subsequent imaging confirming residual small intrahepatic stones. He was discharged two weeks after admission in stable condition. This case highlights the rare complication of stone impaction at a choledochoduodenostomy site and the therapeutic efficacy of endoscopic intervention.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wyke, Min Nay Zar, Zaw Min Naing, Ye Zaw Htwe, Kyaw Ye Naung Htun, Kyaw Thu Linn, Thant Lwyn San, and Khin Aung Htun. 2025. “Endoscopic Extraction of Impacted Stones at Choledochoduodenostomy Site Using Tripod Grasper Forceps: A Rare Case Report”. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies 5 (09):1582-86. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v5-i09-15.
Section
Articles

References

I. Gibson, R.N., Yeong, M.L., and Madden, M.V. 1987. Choledochoduodenostomy: long-term results and complications. Br J Surg, 1987, 74(9): 822-825.

II. Misra, S.P., Gulati, P., and Thorat, V.K. 1989. Complications following choledocho-duodenostomy. Am J Gastroenterol, 1989, 84(6): 624-627.

III. Liau, K.H., Venkatesh, S.K., Ho, and C.K. 2006. Biliary-enteric anastomosis: Complications and management. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2006, 35(2): 94-101.

IV. Williams, E.J., Green, J., Beckingham, I., Parks, R., Martin, D., and Lombard, M. 2008. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut, 2008, 57(7): 1004-1021.

V. Costamagna, G., Tringali, A., and Mutignani, M. 2012. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: A review. Clin Endosc, 2012, 45(3): 220-226.

VI. Hong, W.D., Zhu, Q.H., and Huang, Q.K. 2014. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(39): 13946-13951.

VII. Testoni, P.A., Mariani, A., Aabakken, L., et al. 2016. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: ESGE Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy, 2016, 48(7): 657-683.

VIII. Cotton, P.B., and Leung, J.W. Advanced Digestive Endoscopy: ERCP. Wiley-Blackwell, 2005.

IX. Chen, Y.K., and Pleskow, D.K. 1996. Management of difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 1996, 6(1): 123-140.

X. Uchiyama, K., et al. 2003. Long-term prognosis after choledochoduodenostomy. Surgery, 2003, 133(6): 639-643.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>